Has A Woman’s Perception Of Relationships Actually Changed?

Has A Woman’s Perception Of Relationships Actually Changed?

After watching what can only be described as car crash television, i tuned in last night to “Love Rat & Proud”, this programme delved and showed it’s viewers that sleeping with as many people as possible is a badge of honour.

From the people that were shown, we had a woman that had 5 men on the go at the same time, which to be brutally honest she actually looked like a hooker, we then had a twenty something man who set up his own school to show other men how to get women, but i thought the whole love rat school was a bit over the top and thought they tactics he was teaching actually degraded women.

We then had a older man who claimed to have slept with over a 1000 women, which he met through dating sites, again i very much doubt he had slept with a 1000 women, let alone 10 women.

What we see from the 2 men in the show, is that they see women as cattle and  meat they can simply fuck when they please. From what we see from these two is that they have deep commitment issues, it’s clear these two will end up sad and lonely.

We see that the media, internet and other sources project this type of image we have on relationships, but it’s wrong.

Men will never truly understand how women think, it doesn’t matter how smart your are or perceptive you are, women will always be mysterious creatures. We can sum up initially what a woman’s perception of the relationship they want is, as below:

What Women Look For In A Man?!

  • Good Listener
  • Positive Role Model (Potential Father/Husband)
  • Generous, Attentive, Caring

From the small but to the point list, the show never depicted that women look for this in a man, but we do know that women do look for this, no matter what their background or cultural status, why?

We can look at the Mr Darcy type of man, he’s romantic, cultured and everything women look for in a man, well he used to be.

Moving on from the show that i watched, relationships today are built around sex and not romance, it could be a contribution to the rise in un-wanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted illness.

I’m sure and as sure as hell, that if you bought the lady in your life a bunch of roses and chocolates and took her for a romantic champagne picnic, you will be setting yourself up for the best relationship or romance of your life.

Of course if sex is all your looking then, that’s fine, but lasting relationships are built around romance and love, not sex. Sex is considered a perk within a relationship, but why rush into it, there’s plenty of fun to be had before the big night of passion.

Revolution Vs Terrorism, When Does Revolution Become Terrorism?

Revolution Vs Terrorism, When Does Revolution Become Terrorism?

We all view terrorists as the scum of the Earth, the people that make other people’s lives a misery with bombing campaigns for either a political or religious cause. Although some terrorists do bomb or kill other people for no apparent reason other than their own cause that no one seems to understand.

But when does a Revolution become Terrorism?

Well a Revolution usually starts out with the common people, a little bit different to the way terrorists work. I consider myself to be a revolutionary, but not a terrorist, i do want to see change in a diplomatic and peaceful manner. Without a peaceful or as near peaceful Revolution you cannot gain support of your fellow peers in your struggle for your cause.

Do i see the need to bomb or kill people? No, i do want to see however more power transferred to the people, where the government is the servant of the people and we are the masters.

How far can a peaceful Revolution go, before violence has to be used?

We can see from the recent Military coup in Thailand that for them it was a simple process of transferring power from the government to the Military.

Governments are far more likely to open a discussion with revolutionaries than terrorists, why? A revolution is usually the people of your own country rising up against the government and discussions are important with the well being of the state and society.

But we do come back to the main question, if the government doesn’t open up a line of communication with you, when does your revolution become a act of terrorism, is it when:

  • You state your aims of over throwing the government?
  • The first bomb/bullet is cast?
  • When your group of revolutionaries forms for the first time?

It’s difficult to say, because anti-terror laws are rigid in the sense that anyone can be labeled a terrorist.

But if your declare war on your own government, which means your revolution has now become a armed force, is it lawful if you go through the UN?

Another grey area, it’s more than likely your seen in the UN as a unrecognized armed force, terrorists if you will, so your not likely to gain any support.

The whole point of this post actually looks past the main title, as we speak Gordon Brown is giving evidence at the Iraq Inquiry, the point of the Inquiry is to see if the government was lawful in going to war with Iraq, if it wasn’t lawful, should we view the government as terrorists, just like they do with people with a view or opinion outside their line of thinking? I think so!

There is one thing you can learn, people like myself who consider themselves to be a revolutionary are highly politically motivated and diplomacy is more on the minds of the revolutionary, when it comes to getting things changed within a country.

Terrorists generally carry out orders given to them, either in the form of brain washing or the way they’ve been conditioned to carry out their attacks.

I’ll let you have your thoughts on this subject, but what i can tell you and you’ll have to open your mind is that the following organizations are failed revolution organizations:

  • KKK (Ku Klux Klan)
  • Black Panthers
  • IRA

Those organizations have been in existence for a longtime now and have never changed a single element of life in their respective countries.

Speaking your mind is your god given right and you have the right to say what you want, as long as it does not cause violence or death against anyone and the only place i know where you can truly speak your mind and baecuase free speech is protected their is the USA, the perfect place for a peaceful revolution to start.

Should We Be Protecting This Scum?

Should We Be Protecting This Scum?

One of the killers of toddler Jamie Bulger has been returned to prison, but we are still yet to be told what for. It’s obvious this degenerate has breached his parole, but the main question is, was 8 years enough?

8 years was by no means enough for the 2 killers and you can’t stop bleating on about they had a bad childhood, there’s lots of people that have bad childhoods and they don’t kill people. I do think we should have left Europe, brought back the death penalty and put these two on the end of a rope when they reached 18.

We should not have changed their identity or put a injunction on pictures of them, they killed a little boy that did nothing more than go out shopping with his mother and these two animals took his life, it’s hight time the bullshit European Union and this Government got their heads out of their backsides and realised that animals like this should be put down like the dogs they are.

I’m sick of the victims being left with no justice and the criminals getting everything they want.

They may have been children when they committed this crime, but that’s no excuse.

Jon Venables and his accomplice should never have been released in 2001 and really they should be left to die in prison, it’s pretty obvious that the 8 years Jon Venables has already spent behind bars didn’t change him and it never will.

Foreign Investment Obviously Not Good For English Football!

Foreign Investment Obviously Not Good For English Football!

Today in the high court Portsmouth Football Club will begin the process of going into administration, this will also incur on the club a 9 point deduction, which has most certainly relegated them from the Premier League.

There have been 2 reports that contradict each other, one stating the club has debts of around £70 million and another stating the club has debts of around £60 million, the 10 million difference doesn’t really matter, what matters is how could the governing bodies of Football allow clubs like Portsmouth to get into so much debt?

It’s the case of the bankers all over again, this time it’s Football that’s not been regulated enough and foreign investors with inflated amounts of money to their names have been allowed to take over clubs without putting anything into them and simply just taking from them.

Could this be a warning to other clubs owned by foreign investors, Yes!

Even the bigger clubs should take note that they too are in trouble if they don’t regulate their finances more tightly.

A lot of the investment is made by businessmen who don’t have a interest in Football, they only see it as another business for them to control. Although Football can be run like a business, it can’t, it’s too much of a different business model and you need to understand Football, to understand the business and politics of Football.

I don’t doubt Portsmouth will bounce back, after all Accrington Stanley came back after they went into administration, but it will be a rocky road ahead for the club and the supporters.

As a economist i can only say to the fans, be very skeptical about who you welcome to your club as a owner, some of the foreign investors say they have this and that and really they don’t, they’re just going from one loan to another.

How Much Faith Do You Put In Polls?

How Much Faith Do You Put In Polls?

It’s amazing, he’s a genius, you would be saying if you could believe in the latest poll released by the clipboard army and the Daily Telegraph.

This new polls says that Gordon Brown’s Labour Party is only 5 points behind the blue army of David Cameron, but isn’t Gordon hated, haven’t we had enough of him? Of course we have, but can you put faith in these polls that can easily be manipulated to go one way or the other depending on how much cash you have?

Let’s do a checklist of what we think or what we already know people think of Gordon Brown.

  • Is Gordon Brown a useless fat twat? – Yes
  • Did Gordon Brown and his Government send us into recession – Yes
  • Did Gordon Brown get us out of recession? – Possibly
  • Should Gordon Brown have pulled our troops out of Afghanistan? Yes, but he hasn’t!

Ok, so those aren’t all the thoughts of the people, but they are some of them and my own thoughts of course, so how has Gordon Brown managed to get within 5 points of pretty boy Cameron, he hasn’t of course, it’s just another poll that has been either manipulated, or they people polled who are known to be Labour supporters.

Next week there will be another poll out saying Gordon has dropped 10 points or something like that. Don’t read too much into it, election day will decide who the people like the most.

Obama May Press On With Reforms Without Republican Help

Obama May Press On With Reforms Without Republican Help

It’s been quiet for a few weeks on the Obama front, it doesn’t mean there’s been nothing to report,well it’s just the British media has either tired of him already or just what’s been happening within our own government has been a lot more news worthy.

Obama is still trying to get this healthcare reform bill through and as usual the Republicans and rogue Democrats are holding it up. Obama has warned that he will press ahead with the reforms with or without the Republicans help.

So why doesn’t he just do it then?

It seems the novelty has worn of Barack Obama, we all know he’s black, but skin colour doesn’t mean he can’t be a good or bad politician. It doesn’t seem as though the Obama administration is going anywhere, at least Bush had 9/11, without 9/11 for Bush his presidency would have ground to a complete halt.

Should Obama be doing more for the American people?

It’s hard to say, he does need to bring jobs to the people and some of the more poverty stricken places, he needs to tackle the gangs head on and organized crime, there’s a whole host of stuff he should be doing and be putting it into motion, instead he’s stuck on this one thing, the healthcare reform and seems to have divided the country and probably more since the civil war.